UK homeowners aren’t crippled, they’re rolling in it

I’m quite bemused by the press reaction to yesterday’s interest rate hike in the UK. Almost every newspaper has chosen to focus on how the average homeowner is going to be crippled now that UK interest rates have gone up from 5.5% to 5.75%. The Daily Mail calls it Homeowner Misery, and has calculated that the average cost of a £125,000 mortgage is up £130 per month compared to this time last year (when UK interest rates were 4.5%).

Homeowner misery? Are UK homeowners really being squeezed that much? The best way to look at this is to work out the average monthly mortgage payment as a percentage of the average homeowner’s income. According to the Council of Mortgage Lenders, interest payments formed 17.3% of average income at the end of May, which is only a fraction above the historical average. Compare this to Q2 1990, when UK interest rates stood at 15% and mortgage payments formed 27.1% of average income (click on chart to enlarge).

And what’s an extra £160 per month when the price of the average UK house has risen 11.1% over the past 12 months? Assuming that the price of an average house is now £215,000, the average homeowner has seen the value of his or her property increase by nearly £25,000 in one year, and by more than £100,000 since the beginning of 2002. Surely homeowners are happy, not miserable? Homeowner misery is when prices collapse like the early 1990s. If you accept the press’s argument, homeowners should have been delirious in the early 1990s, because mortgage payments plummeted by over 50% as interest rates were slashed to offset the housing Armageddon.

The UK bond market is now pricing in interest rates to peak at 6.25% at the beginning of 2008, but if the Bank of England is serious about slowing the UK housing market, it could well have to put rates up by much more than investors are anticipating.


The value of investments will fluctuate, which will cause prices to fall as well as rise and you may not get back the original amount you invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

Discuss Article

  1. richard lander says:

    Great point. Have added and embellished on this (hopefully!) at Re: UK homeowners aren't crippled, they're rolling in it

    Posted on: 09/07/07 | 12:00 am
  2. Steve Williams says:

    Your comments are insightful as ever, Richard. The press are a constant source of bemusement to us at Cormorant Capital Strategies too. One or two details do get lost in the mean average of course. Those that have purchased houses at the lower end of the market see higher relative costs and it is not easy to access the gains from rising house prices. Purchasers in this sector of the market benefit less well from the bulk of rises in average earnings too. An extra £160 for some home-owners is significant. That proportion of the home-owning population may be small but the impact of any fallout here has some potential to upset the wider market. Re: UK homeowners aren't crippled, they're rolling in it

    Posted on: 11/07/07 | 12:00 am
  3. Richard Woolnough says:

    The Council of Mortgage Lenders have adjusted the interest payment calculations to exclude MIRAS (and previous to this MITR). If you want to see the raw data, then visit the Council of Mortgage Lenders website and download “homeowners, lending and affordability” (ML3). Re: UK homeowners aren't crippled, they're rolling in it

    Posted on: 13/07/07 | 12:00 am

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.