See you on the other side

Now that the new budget has been announced by George Osborne and spending review disseminated, the coalition is lauding its merits and the opposition is deflecting responsibility for the deficit and exposing flaws in the cuts.  Today’s budget and public sector reforms will see billions cut from welfare spending, Whitehall budgets reduced, the retirement age raised, quangos culled and a permanent levy forced upon the banks.  These austerity measures are taken with the intention of eliminating the structural deficit by 2015.

Many of these cuts implemented by the Chancellor were predicted / leaked and indeed austerity is believed to be the means to improving the UK’s balance sheet after quantitative easing and a decade of high spending.  Although the political parties will debate exactly who was responsible for the deficit and what the correct action should be, the consensus opinion is that cuts were required and indeed were the only suitable remedy to the situation in which we find ourselves.


However a contrarian view is given by the IMF in their “World Economic Outlook” report they released this month. The data they have collated suggests that cuts do not necessarily lead to economic improvement, their data captured in this chart shows that a 1% fiscal cut in GDP typically reduces GDP by 0.5% and increases unemployment by 0.3% over 2 years.  This would suggest the £81 billion (around 5.8% of GDP) of cuts announced today could lead to a 3% reduction in GDP and unemployment reaching 9% by 2012. It should be noted that the IMF’s empirical data does not take into account any potential for further monetary stimulus (QE) and its beneficial effects. It does, however, provide food for thought and suggests that although cuts may be in the interest of the UK’s long term balance sheet, they could have at least a short term negative impact on growth. 

This is obviously going to mean that the UK economy is going to face a potentially dramatic onslaught of cutbacks reducing growth and increasing unemployment over the next year. George Osborne’s message is that this short term pain is essential for the long term health of the UK economy.  We look forward to seeing if this medicine works. As Ozzy Osbourne once sang – See You On The Other Side.

Discuss Article

  1. Anonymous says:

    I think that you have confused quarterly with annual GDP.  UK GDP is about £1.4 trillion at an annual rate.  So the £81bn is about 5.5-6% of GDP…

    Posted on: 20/10/10 | 12:00 am
  2. Jeremy Beckwith says:

    £81bn is not  20% of GDP in 2014/15, it is only 4.5% – makes a bit of difference to your numbers!

    Posted on: 21/10/10 | 12:00 am
  3. Anonymous says:

    £81bn is actually only a 5.8% of the UKs GDP (around £1,400bn) and not 20% of GDP. This implies a 2.9% reduction in real GDP and a 1.7 pc point increase in unemployment according to the IMF research.

    Still a sizeable hole for the private sector of net exports to attempt to fill, but not quite the catastrophic numbers of a 10% reduction in GDP!

    Posted on: 21/10/10 | 12:00 am

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.