Argentina’s century bond: much ado about nothing

Argentina’s recently issued century bond deal was unexpected in terms of timing and maturity. Century bonds in Emerging Markets (EM) are rare (we think the table below is pretty exhaustive) and they grab the headlines, especially when issued by a credit that has defaulted many (many) times, like Argentina.

Are century bonds that much risker?

  1. Duration: As we wrote previously, the duration of century bonds is not much longer than the duration of 30-year bonds, which themselves are quite common amongst emerging markets, including Argentina.
  1. Implied probability of default. Another way to measure the risk of this bond is to calculate its implied probability of default. Using a standard ISDA model, we assigned a 30% recovery value (similar to the last Argentinean default in 2001) and the term premia of the recently issued century bonds (T+ 515 bps) to extrapolate the spread curve. Under these assumptions (ignoring any CDS-bond basis), the probability of default is as per below:

Given the unusual maturity of the bond, the model choked after 50 years. However, we can see that the implied probability of default given these assumptions is already at 97% for a bond maturing in 50 years. Given this, a century bond should not be seen as being much riskier. In other words, the current level of Argentinean spreads is at an unstable equilibrium: either fundamentals will continue improving and credit spreads will continue to fall over the next decades or history will repeat itself, fundamentals will not improve and Argentina will default again. In this latter scenario, it almost does not matter then whether you are holding a 50-year bond or a century bond.

‘In the long run we are all dead’ John Maynard Keynes

To conclude then, the duration of a 30 year Argentinian bond at 11.8 years is little different to that of a century bond (12.7 years), so spread risk is not significantly higher.  The default risk of a 30 year bond is close to 100% anyway given current pricing of long term Argentinian risk – how much worse can it be in a 100 year bond?

What about the prospects for Argentina’s economy?

In terms of fundamentals, Argentina’s new administration is trying to address deep challenges that were inherited from the prior administration. There has been rapid progress on liberalizing capital controls and they have unified the currency market under a new floating exchange rate regime. Relations with investors have improved markedly and this bond attests to that. On the domestic side, however, the improvements have been more gradual.  Inflation (measured by the City of Buenos Aires CPI) is declining as the pass-through the Peso depreciation dissipates but is still hovering above 20%.

Growth is picking up, led by investment, and this will be critical in addressing two of Argentina’s medium term risks:

  1. The fiscal position remains very weak, with a deficit of over 6% of GDP. This means that Argentina still depends largely on the external markets to finance these deficits as the domestic market cannot fund it all. Higher and sustained levels of growth will be required to improve the fiscal dynamics through higher revenues and allow for political room to continue reducing some rigid expenditures, including subsidies on tariffs and transport.
  2. The key risk is the sustainability of Macri’s market-friendly and orthodox economic policies. An initial test will be the outcome of the midterm elections this October, but the litmus test will be the presidential elections in 2019. In absence of economic improvements, higher growth, lower inflation and improvement of real wages, the return of populist policies should the Peronist party start recovering lost ground and win the 2019 elections cannot be ruled out. That will be very bearish for asset prices.

Discuss Article

  1. Mary says:

    It’s a joy to read your articles.Here i have seen some relevant information on Instant Forex Support Forum.

    Posted on: 23/06/17 | 12:07 pm
  2. Kevin says:

    Good write up but you haven’t mentioned liquidity risk. Assuming you are not intending to hold it for 100 years, you need to find a bid at some stage. If the Mexico 100 year is any guide, bid side liquidity is shocking.

    Posted on: 23/06/17 | 12:26 pm
    • Claudia Calich says:

      Valid point, thank you Kevin. Liquidity tends to be lower in these types of bonds, but part of this is already incorporated in their respective spreads in my view. All 3 main century bonds (Mexico in USD, Petrobras and now Argentina) are quoted at a wider spread vs their 30-year equivalents. In the case of Mexico, that is around +100 bps, Petrobras +80 bps and Argentina +60 bps thus far. Part of this could be due to the investor base – I would expect investment grade credits to be partially held by IG-type long-term investors (i.e. insurance companies that have long-term liabilities and need long-term assets), which tend to be more buy and hold in nature. This will reduce the trading volume and turnover of the bonds. In the case of riskier credits such as Argentina, this may likely be less of a factor and turnover may ironically end up being higher. However, liquidity in higher beta credits (Argentina being one of them) will suffer in market sell-offs and the question is whether +60 bps compensate for that or not.

      Posted on: 23/06/17 | 6:01 pm

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *